Can fun and marketing coexist?

Jeff Bullas just published a provocatively-titled blog post that's making the rounds: 5 Reasons why Social Media is Not Fun Anymore. He notes that the roots of Facebook and YouTube were in silly, mindless entertainment and personal time-wasting.Now that companies take these spaces seriously and are spending billions of dollars to market in them, have they stopped being fun? And, consequently, does that spell their imminent downfall?

So will social media maintain its fun origins or will big corporate marketing take the fun out of social media and turn them into business tools that are organised and sterilized?

What happens when mom and dad crash the party? Is it the beginning of the end? Or can they join the fun?

Jeff thinks that they can coexist, and that social channels can "continue to keep us entertained, amused, informed and educated all at the same time".

But what about the underlying claim – that people are fun and corporations are serious? Does a company automatically get releged to "boring" status just because its interests are business, not personal?

Maybe. Maybe not. We're seeing examples of companies breaking through the clutter and getting their message across to customers by virtue of the fact that they've retained that sense of fun. And social media is letting them do it in a way that seemed inaccessible when the options amounted to TV or radio.

Sure, far too many companies rely on their agencies or creative teams to "make them look cool". The thing is, social media has a funny way of letting the true character of the company shine through. The boring ones come across as boring, no matter how much they try to hire the young, hip community manager and air the quirky campaign. The fun ones, on the other hand, can display their character and actually get recognition for it.

Jeff makes a great point, that if you suck all the fun out of these spaces, people will migrate elsewhere. If too many marketers march into these parties all buttoned-up and insist on flooding them with boring ads, social media will stop being fun.

But marketers shouldn't feel like they can't join the party. It's easy. Loosen the necktie, roll up the sleeves, and take a few chances. You can be fun and successful at the same time. You just have to dress for the occasion.

The wisdom of hockey crowds?

The decision by the Montreal Canadiens this season to allow the fans to pick the three stars of each game, by voting online or via a mobile application, is causing a stir – and significant debate – among hockey fans.

On the one hand, many are lauding the move for getting the fans involved. After all, there are no fans more passionate than Habs fans (says this Habs fan). Montreal is a city with three and a half million general managers, where every single fans believes that they know best. The three stars, traditionally selected by the media, were usually met with barely more than an eyeblink. Now, people can participate.

But is this really such a good idea?

Continue reading “The wisdom of hockey crowds?”

Calling all chocoholics

Just when you thought there weren’t enough niche social platforms out there – the Swiss have launched a social network for chocolate lovers:

 “Modeled on successful precursors like Facebook and MySpace, myswisschocolate.ch, based in the small town of Pfaeffikon near Zurich, provides a virtual platform for people who share a love of the sugary treat that is the country’s trademark.

[ . . . ]

The virtual balance of the chocolate-lover’s account can then be converted into real chocolate — handmade by myswisschocolate.ch and shipped to 15 countries worldwide.”

Continue reading “Calling all chocoholics”

The things we don’t say

Social media is about honesty and authenticity.

Now, where have I heard that before? Oh, that's right, everywhere. People are more honest when they share their instant thoughts in real conversations. Posting a comment on a blog. Posting a review on a hotel ratings site. Posting photos of their cats on Twitter. It's all honest, right?

Except, not. Because we're all running scared of honesty. Too much honesty can come back to haunt us.

Continue reading “The things we don’t say”

Conversations are still happening (just not where you think)

There’s been lots of conversation lately about whether conversations are dead. Ironic? Yes, but not in the Alanis Morissette sense of the word. Mitch Joel’s blog post, The End Of Conversation In Social Media asks the question:

“Are we seeing a new shift in Social Media? Are the conversations dead? Were they ever – really – alive? What do you think?”

(Yes, this is more content inspired by my boss and colleagues at Twist Image. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.)

Well, I contend that the conversations aren’t dead. They’re still happening. But maybe it was unrealistic of us to expect them to happen in certain types of social media channels.

Blogs are publishing platforms. Twitter is a broadcast platform. Facebook is quasi-conversational, but only in the how’s-it-going superficial chatting about the weather sense. It’s easy to see how we can look at all of these platforms and wonder, is there any real conversation taking place?

Yes, it is. But not where you think. To find the real conversations, we need to visit online communities. The old-school kind.

Continue reading “Conversations are still happening (just not where you think)”

Are brands really listening?

If there’s a marketing buzzword in 2010, it’s probably “listening”. Companies are trying to engage with their customers. They’re being told that they have to monitor, track, and join the conversations that are taking place across social media channels every single day.

They’re setting up alerts, monitoring keywords, and even investing in listening tools, such as Radian 6 or Sysomos. Why? To find those elusive customer insights into what their target market thinks, feels and desires.

After all, social media means a revolution in market research. You no longer have to go out and conduct very expensive research to find out what people want. They’re online, in social channels, shouting it loudly and clearly for anyone to hear. All brands need to do is to listen to those needs, and respond to them. Right?

Well, that’s the theory, anyway. But in practice, it sometimes seems like the more information brands have about their customers’ wants and needs, the further they get from responding to them. Why is it, with companies trying so hard to fill customer needs, and people trying so hard to buy what they need, that there’s still such a disconnect between what people want and what brands are selling?

Are brands really listening to their customers? Or are they only looking for what they want to hear?

Continue reading “Are brands really listening?”

Anonymity, compartmentalization or multibranding?

Are we seeing a trend towards more anonymity online? What are the implications of increased anonymity? Does being anonymous necessarily mean having something to hide?

These are some of the questions that Mitch Joel asks in today’s blog post: The Next Big Thing Online Could Well Be Anonymity:

The knee-jerk reaction to anonymity is that the person creating the content has “something to hide.” It’s logical, but it’s not the entire story. Some people simply feel more liberated to speak their mind knowing that who they are will not become a focal point within that discussion.

(Full disclosure: I’ve been working for Mitch and the team at Twist Image for a little over three years now. You’ll likely see quite a bit of content from the folks at TI on this space. That’s what happens when you’re lucky enough to work with smart people who write thought-provoking content.)

I think an excellent point has been raised here. And it occurs to me that we may be talking about the wrong thing. Instead of “anonymity” versus “transparency”, are we really not simply talking about compartmentalization? Or, to put it another way, a personal version of multibranding?

In fact, I think this is a particularly appropriate topic for the inaugural post of a new blog, launched by a person with a digital presence in quite a few arenas. So here goes:

Continue reading “Anonymity, compartmentalization or multibranding?”